Prosecutors, judges and sentencing disparities: Evidence from traffic offenses in France - EconomiX Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue International Review of Law and Economics Année : 2022

Prosecutors, judges and sentencing disparities: Evidence from traffic offenses in France

Résumé

While there is widespread evidence that sentences for similar cases tend to differ across courts, the production of sentencing disparities by prosecutors versus judges has received very limited attention to date. In this paper, we focus on this issue using traffic offenses data from neighboring courts in SouthEast France. First, we measure disparities for observably similar cases both at the extensive margin (type of sentences) and intensive margin (quantum) and find large differences in sentencing across courts. Second, we decompose those disparities between the influence of prosecutors through their procedural choices (simplified versus classical criminal procedures) and that of judges who always have the final word on sentences. While there is heterogeneity in the role of prosecutors between courts, we find that most sentencing disparities cannot be explained by the sole decisions of prosecutors.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
prosecutorsjudges_IRLE_R1.pdf (851.11 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-03913071 , version 1 (17-01-2023)

Identifiants

Citer

Alessandro Melcarne, Benjamin Monnery, François-Charles Wolff. Prosecutors, judges and sentencing disparities: Evidence from traffic offenses in France. International Review of Law and Economics, 2022, 71, pp.106077. ⟨10.1016/j.irle.2022.106077⟩. ⟨hal-03913071⟩
46 Consultations
31 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More